WauwatosaNOW.com
search all things local
     
Blog Home |  Email Author  |        Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

West Side Stories

A Tosa resident for more than 15 years, Karen is a stay-at-home mom with two children who enjoys writing and playing tennis. She spends the fall and winter in the stands at Green Bay Packer and Marquette basketball games.


Karen is the former community columnist for the Wauwatosa NOW newspaper.

Why I Blog

By Karen Waldkirch
Friday, Sep 19 2008, 04:43 PM

Sometimes I’m asked why I blog. (Most other times, people don’t really want to know and I’m looked at with a mixture of scorn and pity as if I just admitted that I collect dead bugs.)

 

Well, the answer, for me, is that I blog because deep inside, I’m still an adolescent. I’m still that awkward, chubby girl with bad skin, sitting in my bedroom, listening to Elton John and writing madly in my diary. For me, writing has always been the only way to explain what was going on in my head. But that’s only half of it.

 

I also blog because, if I’m lucky, once a year, somebody will come up to me in the grocery store or at the car wash, and say: “I like what you wrote. You get it.” To me, a simple comment like that makes me walk on air for a week. And it helps me forget when my dad asks me about “that thing you’re doing for free…your…what do you call it – glog?!”

 

We bloggers are certainly not doing it for the money, because, there is none. And although some bloggers out there on the internet are paid, I have neither the knowledge nor the wherewithal to figure out how to make that happen. Besides, the 10 or 20 Wauwatosa people that stumble on my blog are a decent audience. Heck, that’s a good-sized crowd for Thanksgiving, so who am I to complain?

 

This week, about 30 of us blogging types gathered at the Journal Sentinel offices. We came from all corners of the metro-Milwaukee area. We all have different reasons to blog and different ways of going about it. Some want to effect change in their communities.  Others, like me, just have the writing bug and wouldn’t mind adding a touch of humor or interest to somebody’s day.

 

On hand to cheer us on were “the bigs” from the Journal Sentinel: President and Publisher, Betsy Brenner, Sr. VP/Editor Marty Kaiser and Sr. VP/Interactive Media and Audience Development Sharon Prill. They told us that we were “the future” of what’s going on in journalism (Ray Py will love hearing that) and that they were working hard to stay on top of current and emerging trends. We even got a sneak peek at some new website technology that will affect us all, hopefully, in a positive way.

 

We were given ample opportunity to ask anything we wanted about the Journal Sentinel. The one question that I had, and was asked by someone else, was about the future of the Journal Sentinel. Brenner and Kaiser answered deftly, albeit also vaguely, basically explaining that recent changes made were based on market conditions and information that was available more readily and more up-to-date elsewhere (such as stock quotes). It’s an uphill battle. Sadly (a self-defeating statement coming from a blogger), more and more people are getting their news from the internet. The Journal Sentinel is working hard to get a piece of that action, but I can’t help but be concerned about the future of my favorite early morning routine – reading the local paper. Unfortunately, there are fewer and fewer of us reading the Journal Sentinel every day. Sigh.

 

I guess what I’m saying is three-fold: First, if you read my blog or other blogs, thanks. It means a lot. Second, be sure to share your thoughts, either through comments or e-mails. We don’t get paid, but feedback is awesome payback. Third, if you love reading the paper, subscribe to it, talk about it, buy it and talk about it some more. It won’t survive if readership dwindles. If you don’t like what you read, tell them about it. They welcome any and all comments.

 
Filed under:
Permalink |  Mail to a friend

Comments

Ray Py   

Years ago when I was interviewed for my first newspaper job, I offered to work my first week without pay.  The interviwer who was my editor for many years. yelled at  so loudly that he caught the attention of the entire newsroom.  "Don't. don't ever say that again.  Do you think that by working for nothing, you are doing your colleagues any favors?  

So, I never did.  I did read, however, that your seminar at the Journal promised free beer so I guess that is another blog-bonus--your picturte, your by-line, and occasionally free beer.

I don't think that combination is going to please that old editor of mine, but it may help the Journal fill those news holes without the need of spending any actual money.

Yeah, I love it.

Ray Py

September 20, 2008 8:53 AM

90th Street Conservative   

Why does nobody read the Journal anymore?  Perhaps because it is a joke.  They are a newspaper.  Maybe they should act like one.  While I like to read Jim Stingl, the fact they need to put him on the front page (vs. front page of the Metro), means this is quite a weak paper.  Would you rather watch FoxNews for real reporting, or read JSONLINE to read the latest weak news coverage?

September 20, 2008 11:58 PM

Karen Waldkirch   

Hmmmm....well, these comments are quite interesting. So, Ray, I guess you are saying that my blogging for free hurts the real journalists out there? Gosh, I couldn't begin to imagine that was so and I certainly wouldn't presume to be able to come close to their talents and abilities.

90th St. Conservative - well, I guess my JS cheerleading didn't spur you on. But, if you know anything about me, it's that I detest television news. And Fox would probably be at the top of that list - sorry. I guess my question to you would be: What should a newspaper act like?

September 21, 2008 8:28 AM

Ray Py   

Yes.

September 21, 2008 3:50 PM

Thomas   

Hey Karen…

I like the JournalSentinel too.

There’s nothing quite like a real paper to fumble-with when you are having a cup of joe.

I subscribe to the NY Times – and read that while on the treadmill at the gym.

Try to do that with a laptop.

Seriously – the JS does a pretty decent job of covering local and statewide news. For national and international news you need to reach-out.  The Times and the BBC do a reasonably decent job and  it’s not too difficult to read thru their editorial biases.

Fox on TV – Blech.

The dumbing-down of American media. Pablum.

September 21, 2008 7:01 PM

joeythelovesponge   

I read your writing because you're creative, interesting and I like your style.  Your talents and abilities are on par with many people who are paid to do the same thing.  

September 21, 2008 11:17 PM

Karen Waldkirch   

Tom, Joey - you're the best!

And Tom, I too love the NYTimes. I did subscribe for a while, but I wasn't reading it consistently enough. But it's a special treat once in a while.

September 22, 2008 7:18 AM

STUBBORNOLDMAN   

I'm a fairly regular contributor on the West Allis blogs.  I read your comment about Marty Kaiser asking you to ask ANYTHING at all about the Journal Sentinel during your blogger meeting there.  I really wished that I was in that same room as all you bloggers were for the tour of the newspaper offices.

On more than one instance, I've written that bias is not evident on what IS reported, but rather what IS NOT reported.  Here's a classic case from a recent story a few weeks ago to prove my point:

There was a robbery in Shorewood and it was reported in the newspapers.

Here's how the story was reported by the Journal Sentinel newspaper:

www.jsonline.com/.../index.aspx

Here's how the SAME story was reported by the suburban ShorewoodNow newspaper:

www.shorewoodnow.com/watch

Notice anything peculiar?  BOTH stories were originally written by the same guy, Ryan Haggerty.  Take another look at the two stories...  I'll give you a minute...  

THE JOURNAL SENTINEL STORY CONVIENENTLY NEGLECTED TO REPORT THAT THE SUSPECT WAS A BLACK MAN!  Now, please try to tell me that the Journal Sentinel newspaper is REALLY interested in reporting the news as it happens, rather than a sanitized version of the same news.  Come on, I dare you.

By the way, the Journal Sentinel has a track record of doing the same type of sanitization when it comes to political reporting.  Any time a Republican politician does some thing wrong, the (R) is almost always printed next to the guy's name.  But, when a Democrat does something wrong, the (D) is mysteriously missing.  I'm sure it's a coincidence.  Yeah, right...

I'd really like to hear what Marty Kaiser and the rest of the 'top dogs' at the Journal Sentinel would have to say about this concrete example of liberal bias.  Maybe THAT'S one reason why people don't put as much faith in the newspaper as in the past.

Now, GET OFF MY LAWN! ;)

September 23, 2008 9:33 PM

STUBBORNOLDMAN   

By the way, I'm a paying subscriber to the Journal Sentinel since 1993.  Right now, I get the Thursday through Sunday paper delivered to my house.  So, in that regard, I think I have a right to expose this to all of you.  Hopefully, somebody at the paper will read this and kick the guy in the head who deleted the word 'black' from the original story.  We can only hope that this particular copy editor who deleted that word was one of the people laid off recently by the paper.  Deleting the word 'black' in that Journal Sentinel story was obviously NOT an accident.  It was a concious decision by some copy editor trying to insert his/her own personal bias ON THE NEWS.  Bias in a printed editorial is fine.  Bias in NEWS reporting is NOT fine.

September 23, 2008 9:49 PM

Laura Beyer   

Hey Karen,

it was a nice meeting last week.  I blog for the same reasons you do.. I have been writing since I was a young girl, and also, hopefully one day someone will say, "because of you, my life was changed"...  Unless an individual is a blogger, there is no way to understand why we do this for free... I love writing, and it gives me a voice, uninterrupted...  

I enjoy reading your blogs...

Laura

September 24, 2008 12:03 AM

Karen Waldkirch   

Wow, it's a regular comment-fest in here! Laura, thanks!

Stubbornoldman, you should e-mail Marty Kaiser. I've done that in the past and found him to be open to thoughtful comments and criticisms. He also responds in a timely fashion.

September 24, 2008 6:39 AM

STUBBORNOLDMAN   

Let's ALL e-mail him if any of you feel as strongly about this as I do.  There's power in numbers!

September 24, 2008 7:31 AM

Ray Py   

Karen and others--

Eugene Kane once wrote in his Journal Sentinel column that he had gathered those involved in a melee following a JuneTeenth celebration in which a person had been viciously kicked in the face by an unknown assailiant.  He said he talked street smarts with these people and had solved the matter.  Of course, there was no such meeting and Kane solved nothing.  I wrote to ask him for details of the meeting and he could supply none.  The ficticious conversation, he said, was a practice "commonly" used by journalists and shouldn't I know this, having spent all my life in the profession?

Another time I fought with a reporter in the JS's Waukesha Bureau who wrote a story about a drug overdose victim whose father told the reporter that all the Pewaukiee High School graduating class of 2007 (of which his son was one) had been into drugs.  The reporter told me her editor had authorized the man's statement to be puiblished to the embarrassment of many high school graduates who have never tried drugs, because "the man lost his son."

All of this discussion went in copy form to Marty Kaiser and I have yet to hear from him.  Kane eventually apologized (in a manner of speaking) in column.  The Pewaukee story continued but without reference to the father's quote.

My concern about journalism and the input of "free talent" is that we have untrained journalists who are doing what professional writers did before they were axed for cost cutting purposes.  

My advice to diary writers is that they continue their diary writing but confine it to thosde lock and key books which have limited public access.  That way we don't have to get around them to get at the news hole.

Ray Py

September 24, 2008 11:10 AM

Karen Waldkirch   

Ray, as always, you are welcome to avoid this and any other blog. I personally am not blocking your access to the "news hole." (I don't know what that is, by the way, and don't think I'd like to go there anyway.) It's completely your choice as to what you read and view on a regular basis. Nobody is forcing you to read blogs.

I'll give you an example of something that has worked for me: Mark Belling's program drives me crazy. Although I actually might agree with some of his opinions, his show made me angry every time I turned it on. So I stopped listening. I've been blissfully Belling-free for many years now. I believe that, ultimately, the market speaks. Blogs are everywhere because people read them. Some are terrible and others are quite good. (Hopefully I'm somewhere in the middle of those two extremes.) Eventually, as with anything, the "blog market" will shake itself out and there will be fewer to "get around."

September 24, 2008 11:40 AM

Ray Py   

Karen--With all due respect, it was you who put my name out there in your opening at the top and I do think I have the right--and maybe the obligation--to express my defend myself.  One thing journalists learn early--and must often be reminded of----names are personal and you do not have free access to them.  That is slander.

Ray

September 24, 2008 12:45 PM

STUBBORNOLDMAN   

Karen,

You and I don't know each other, but I'm positive that you will think slightly less of me after you read the next sentence.  The person that alerted me to the missing word 'black' in the Journal Sentinel's story about that Shorewood robbery was Mark Belling on his radio show.

I sent an e-mail to various people at the Journal Sentinel to ask them to comment on this issue of the missing adjective in the paper.  We'll see if I get any response.

September 24, 2008 12:58 PM

Laura Beyer   

Hey Karen,

regarding those of us who are not "trained journalists".  Many folks just have natural talent.  Think of those who have amazing voices (aka: the girl on Oprah) and those whose bodies are flexible enough for a gymnastic gold at the Olympics.  

You have natural talent.  Not everyone will write.  Yet, what some fail to realize is that the writing you and I do is volunteer.  We become vulnerable and allow others into our thoughts, ideas and feelings.  We believe in what we say and have the guts to put it out there.

I agree with your statement above.  We are not demanding anyone read what we have to say.  It is your choice to open this blog and read it.  

The definition of slander is as follows: a malicious, false, and defamatory statement or report: a slander against his good name.

Therefore, I see no slander whatsoever.  I also do not see a need for anyone to defend him or herself due to the fact we all have a right to our own opinions.  

I like your writing, and give you three thumbs up!  Continue doing what you do best, and your faithful readers will continue to follow.  

Laura

September 24, 2008 11:48 PM

Karen Waldkirch   

Ray, I apologize if you feel that I slandered you. I just knew that you'd have strong opinions which you have expressed clearly here. I'd be happy to remove your name from the post, although I don't think I've said anything negative about you in the least.

Stubbornoldman, I do not think less of you at all. I have lots of family and friends that listen to Belling. It just wasn't right for me. I do hope that you get a response to your e-mail to the Journal Sentinel.

Laura, thanks! You made my day!

September 25, 2008 6:41 AM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.

Posts

Your browser must support javascript to use the posts pager. Please enable javascript or return to the home page to page through posts.
Newer Older

Tags

Search the Blogs