WauwatosaNOW.com
search all things local
     
Blog Home |  Email Author  |  About this Blog       Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Curmudgeon's Corner

cur-mud-geon: anyone who hates hypocrisy and pretense and has the temerity to say so; anyone with the habit of pointing out unpleasant facts in an engaging and humorous manner

Winners & Losers...

By Al Campbell
Tuesday, Nov 25 2008, 09:29 AM

Our political system creates winners and it creates losers.  It has done that since there was a political system.  It does that no matter the party in power.  We are watching the reshuffling of the seats of power in Washington now, and that is a great thing to watch since it did not involve a military coup or the forceful overthrow of one regime in favor of another.

The winners and losers are being resorted as the result of the most recent election.  It is interesting to me that I see many of the same faces that I recall seeing over the course of time.  They seem to ebb and flow almost like the tides.  They may be "out of favor" for awhile and then they're back "in favor".  In their cases, there is relatively little difference between the two except that there may be more prestige when they're "in favor".  Money always seems to flow in their direction although it can be diminished when they are "in favor" if that means they hold an office in the government of our country.

We shouldn't anguish over their plight for too long since they seem to make up for any financial duress suffered when they 'retire' from the government position.

Government employees are adept at remaining winners.  Some in Milwaukee County walk away with a million dollars in their pocket at retirement.  Few are ever laid off even though that threat hovers every once in awhile.  All have solid benefit programs.  Few seem to be overworked.  It seems almost impossible to "privatize" any of these positions as we see from the trials and tribulations of Scott Walker as Milwaukee County Executive

Some winners seem adept at remaining winners almost without regard to the party in control.

Some losers seem adept at remaining losers, too.

The perennial losers of whom I am thinking are us...the taxpayers.  It seems we are always coming out on the 'short end of the stick', doesn't it?

Just over the course of three days in November, we learned why we are in the column called "losers".

MATC was given the seemingly perpetual right to tax us to the tune of at least $5.7 million every year since we are blessed to be part of that taxing district.  Us taxpayers took another one in the shorts!

Governor Doyle was quoted as saying "the pain must be shared" in speaking of the current $5.4 billion expected shortfall in the next biennial budget.  We know to whom he was speaking...us taxpayers!

Then to add insult to injury, three gentlemen wrote an article called "How to raise money for our state" that was published on JSOline on November 22nd.  I tote up the great ideas they espoused:

  • the Doyle proposal to increase taxes on oil companies and hospitals to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars
  • a sales tax increase of 1% that would raise something on the order of $800 million per year
  • the extension of the sales tax to non-medical professional services like tax preparation and accounting services that would raise some $300 million per year
  • the extension of the sales tax to business services that would raise $230 million
  • closing business tax "loopholes" for companies doing business in and out of Wisconsin (so-called "combined reporting") that would generate an estimated "several hundred" million dollars a year.
  • elimination of something that is called the "domestic production deduction" that would 'only' impact companies with over $100 million in assets and that would yield "at least $40 million"
  • changing the taxing of businesses from that of taxing profits to a system where business receipts would be taxed instead (so that a business not making a profit would still pay taxes) which would generate some $400 million
  • increasing the top rate on personal income tax from 6.75% to 7.75% ( a nearly 15% increase) which would raise another $180 million
  • taxing all capital gains thus adding some $280 million to the treasury
  • restoring the tax on the first 50% of social security earnings to get another $100 million
  • elimination of a thing called the "itemized deduction credit" that would 'only' hit people earning more than $100,000 per year thus generating $320 million
  • bringing back the tax on inheritances that would generate another $95 million
  • and, last but certainly not least, restoring the annual inflation indexing of our already highest in the nation tax on gasoline that would bring in another $32 million for every penny of gas tax (that would mean something in the range $1 billion annually if the gas tax is now $0.30 per gallon)

I certainly appreciate their attempt to be helpful but I doubt that our governor and the senate and the assembly majorities need any help to raise taxes.

What is forgotten, ALWAYS, is that it is us losers...us taxpayers...who pay every penny of every tax levied in the state in one form or another.

Taxes always find their way to the lowest rung on the economic ladder, and that is us, the consumer and the taxpayer.

There certainly are winners and losers.  Wouldn't it be wonderful if we could experience being a winner once in awhile?

And...isn't it amazing that we never learn how much could be saved if some of the jobs would be eliminated, and if some of the benefits would be reduced, and if some of the massive 'give-away' programs were curtailed?

Yup.  I'm hallucinating, all right!

Comments

taxedtothemax   

Where are the suggestions to cut spending?

November 25, 2008 2:32 PM

CommonSense1234   

Taxed... that's easy eliminate the war in Iraq. "If you add these costs, and others, to the total tab, the cost of the war has jumped from $4.4 billion to $7.1 billion a month since the 2003 fiscal year, according to a paper co-authored in January by Columbia University professor and Nobel-prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz, an outspoken critic of the war. The paper estimates the total cost could top $1 trillion."

November 26, 2008 12:22 AM

CMS   

Let us not forget that the other "losers" in Germantown were the kids who missed the chance to have a better education with better technology, smaller class sizes, full day kindergarten, and more security!

November 26, 2008 5:34 AM

CPL CACHE   

CMS,

My children are not losers, they still recieve a first rate education at the hands of the districts capable teachers. Please explain to me how having a new building is going to provide a better education?  The average class size is under 20 students and all schools are equipped with very nice computer labs (don't forget the teachers have ridiculously expensive leased laptops). As a parent of a child who would be in what would have been all-day Kindergarten, I am bothered by the school board's tactics to try to force the passing of the referendum.  Also, the security needs of the district should be calculated into the operating budget and not piled onto a referendum.  You and the school board need to stop trying to keep up with the Elmbrook school districts of the state at the taxpayer's expense.  There are more creative solutions to this problem than building a new "Extreme Makeover" school.

November 26, 2008 9:31 AM

GTownie   

There will only be any “losers” resulting from the school referendum failure if we don’t move forward with any of the alternatives available to increase both space and state funding, including expanding Rockfield, leasing space either from Menomonee Falls (which is considering closing a school due to declining enrollment) or in one of the many vacant retail developments and business parks in Germantown, or utilizing the School District Offices building which appears to be languishing on the market just a mile or so away from the site of the proposed new school.   Anyone who would refuse to compromise, to the detriment of both the children and the taxpayers, would really be a loser in my book!   But I know the school board has the best interests of the community at heart at all times, so I am confident they will lead us to the next best solution.

November 26, 2008 11:37 AM

Goldenboy75   

More creative solutions you say?  Such as?  

November 26, 2008 11:42 AM

CMS   

Well, it appears as though I have hit a few nerves.  The first point I would like to make here is that in both MacArthur and Rockfield schools the average class size is over 20.  They are 21.1 and 20.6 respectively.  These numbers in and of themselves are of little value, however, with the growth of Germantown even these above 20 average sizes are likely to rise.  As of right now these two schools are unable to accommodate added classes should the numbers require it.  For example, at MacArthur there are 76 students who will be in first grade next year.  There are only 3 first grade teachers.  I, for one, wonder how any teacher as talented and first rate as they may be can handle 25 or 26 six year old students.  Perhaps the board was thinking of this very issue when they discontinued full day kindergarten for next year.  One of the classrooms dedicated to that program will/may be a first grade room next year.  And then what if the numbers are similar for the following year?  I myself do not know these numbers, but they must be available to the board.

Don't get me wrong, I was not and am not excited about any new taxes but I also realize that my taxes went down last year about the same amount they would have gone up next year.  I live near the near empty business park on Mequon Road.  I wonder how much more appealing our village would be to potential business owners had we voted to build a new school to accommodate their children and the children already waiting in our homes.  These businesses would make our village an even "better" place to live.

November 26, 2008 8:11 PM

GTownie   

The only point I have been trying to make is that now that building a new school is off the table, we should pursue smaller-scale alternatives that may be better than doing nothing.  Whether expanding Rockfield, leasing space, or converting the District Offices would be better or worse than building a new school is irrelevant, because the voters have spoken and said there will be no new school for the foreseeable future.  But would these ideas be better than doing nothing?  Does anyone else have any suggestions?  

November 27, 2008 5:35 AM

lhavas   

CMS makes an excellent point with regard to class sizes. I tend to look at all data with a critical eye, and my guess is that the "classes of less than 20" figures are skewed. I wonder whether those are in fact the teacher-to-student ratio, a number which would be lower by virtue of the specialists in the building (reading specialists, special education, etc.)

CPL CACHE: I'm not a Germantown teacher, but I'm not sure what kind of an axe you have to grind by stating this: "all schools are equipped with very nice computer labs (don't forget the teachers have ridiculously expensive leased laptops)" -- but would you really, truly want your child going to a school without any computer access whatsoever? Like it or not, computers are here to stay. They are just some of the teaching tools that are being used in schools today. In the 1800's, it was a slateboard. During my youth we had purple mimeographed worksheets. Technology is a part of education today and Germantown would be doing its students a disservice if they were not providing these tools to the students. (And I would be very interested to know whether the labs might have been partially covered by a grant whose funds could not have been diverted elsewhere.)

The teachers' laptops are undoubtedly used in part for them to maintain open lines of communication between home and school. I use my own personal computer so that I can reply to emails from parents, often as early as 4:30 in the morning. Now, you might argue that that's my choice - but if a parent is notifying me that their child is ill and I have a worksheet stored at home on my computer, I now have a golden opportunity to help a student stay ahead of the game by emailing that worksheet to his/her home. With every teacher having a laptop, every teacher is now capable of doing the same thing. Better, more efficient and uniform communication between home and school is just one benefit of those laptops.

If the referendum had passed, yes, your taxes would have increased. But isn't your child worth it?

www.doe.in.gov/.../fulldaykbenefits.html

November 27, 2008 3:36 PM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.