WauwatosaNOW.com
search all things local
     
Blog Home |  Email Author  |  About this Blog       Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Curmudgeon's Corner

cur-mud-geon: anyone who hates hypocrisy and pretense and has the temerity to say so; anyone with the habit of pointing out unpleasant facts in an engaging and humorous manner

Schools & Education, Part Three...

By Al Campbell
Tuesday, Nov 18 2008, 10:52 AM

While we are discussing the area of compensation, I want to take a 'hypothetical' person whom we'll name Jane Doe, and look at her compensation package.

Jane is in her 10th year with the school district.  She has a Master's degree with less than 15 hours of added credit.  This places her in lane 4 and step 10 of the 'matrix' we discussed yesterday.  Assuming that Jane had her Master's degree in the 2006-2007 school year, her base salary would've been $47,937.  In the 2007-2008 school year, her base salary was $49,703, an increase of some 3.7% even though there was no new contract settled and, thus, no new pay schedule in place.

In the school year we are in today, 2008-2009, Jane would be earning a base salary of $51,469 for an increase year over year of 3.55%.  A QEO offer would've more than doubled those increase percentages for Jane.

Total compensation for Jane this past school year was $85,406 inclusive of benefits in addition to base salary.

My point in this exercise is to give citizens some real life numbers to which they can relate versus the percentages that get thrown about without any actual meaning to most of us.

I do not begrudge the income that our educators earn.  It is very important that our children are well-educated and good teachers are a large part of that equation.

Next, we'll look at the Wisconsin Education Association Council (WEAC) and the WEA Insurance Group.

Comments

Irwin Fletcher   

Thanks Al for trying to clarifying this issue. As a taxpayer, I do not begrudge anyone the opportunity to earn a good living. What I get upset about is that the teachers constantly are saying that they are losing ground to inflation with the QEO. The fact is that every year teachers get a raise and then get an additional raise with the contract increases. Not many of us poor slobs get a raise just for showing up every year and then an additional raise as well. Not bad work if you can get it.

November 18, 2008 3:22 PM

GTownie   

Al - do you have detail on what comprises the $34k worth of benefits?  That seems very high.

November 18, 2008 8:27 PM

Al Campbell   

Gtownie,

The additional costs for Jane Doe can be summarized as follow:

Benefit Costs:

Wisconsin retirement System @ $5,914

FICA @ $3,802

Health Care @ $19,279

Dental Care @ $1,119

Long Term Disability Insurance @ $280

Long Term Care Insurance @ $601

Life Insurance @ $209

Balance of extra costs are for coaching or being a club advisor or mentoring a peer, or filling in as a 'substitute teacher' from time to time even while being paid her regular salary, etc.

I reconize this seemed high, but that is the reality.

November 19, 2008 8:35 AM

JAFO IN GTOWN   

I am finding this interesting, too.  But I am also a bit confused, or maybe not.  I want to make sure I understand this.

Jane's union contract and the pay schedule it contains "expired" in June, 2007.  Jane's pay continued to increase on the old plan, just because one year, and then another, went by and she gained some more tenure, and made about $1800 more in 2007-08, and another $1800 in 2008-2009.  And a QEO would double that?  If I am not mistaken, teachers work 180 days a year, so she's already gotten a raise of $10 per day, $50 a week, for each of the last 2 years?  Honestly, that sounds pretty good to me.  But now doubling it to $100 a week, strikes me as excessive.  And as I understand it, the GEA has rejected this as not being enough of an increase for Jane.

Am I understanding this correctly?

November 19, 2008 4:50 PM

Denny Crane   

I don't understand that QEO either.  But I do know that for years and years teacher pay has been debated with many good points on both sides.  Based on what you have posted Al, $50,000 may seem like alot to some but if the teachers have masters degrees, that pay seems to lag behind that of the private sector.  Masters degrees alone cost in excess of $15,000 which will take quite a few years to pay off.  If they had an MBA and had a 'regular' day job - I'd imagine they wouldn't settle for $50,000 when they can command much more.  But hey - God Bless 'em - I couldn't do that job.  

November 19, 2008 8:25 PM

Karen123   

Denny, most districts, if not all, pay the cost of the Master's Degree.  That is another perk that is often not included in the discussion.

FYI, a private school teacher, (parochial) will start with a salary in the range of $25,000 and there is no extra pay for coaching recess duty, lunch duty, choir, Sunday School teaching, covering for absent teachers, after school performances, etc. etc.  It is all part of the job that they do willingly and with virtually no complaints.  

November 19, 2008 8:47 PM

GTownie   

The health care plan must be pretty rich for $19k.  McCain was slammed for offering a $5,000 tax credit to be used to purchase medical insurance because the national average for family coverage is $12k per year.

November 19, 2008 9:48 PM

CMS   

Karen123

I am not sure where you got your information but I feel the need to correct your contention that school districts ("most, if not all") pay for teachers' masters degrees.  I know of one in the state that does this.  In the three districts in which I have worked I received not one dollar to off set the costs of the credits I needed to take in order to maintain my teaching license. Yes, my salary increased as my education increased but that is a very different thing than being reimbursed for tuition.

November 20, 2008 9:15 AM

CommonSense1234   

This seems like a fairly low salary for a masters degree... I have mine and I make well over the quoted salary + benefits package. Quite frankly, I wouldn't even entertain the thought of accepting the position at that salary.

November 24, 2008 8:40 PM

lhavas   

Karen123, I will second CMS' point about districts paying for master's degrees. It simply isn't done in most districts. Plus, in order to maintain their licensure, teachers must take additional coursework and pay for it on their own. Health care professional must do so as well.

November 28, 2008 6:28 AM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.