WauwatosaNOW.com
search all things local
     
Blog Home |  Email Author  |        Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Conservatively Speaking

State Senator Mary Lazich (R-New Berlin) represents parts of four counties: Milwaukee, Waukesha, Racine, and Walworth. Her Senate District 28 includes New Berlin, Franklin, Greendale, Hales Corners, Muskego, Waterford, Big Bend and parts of Greenfield, East Troy, and Mukwonago. Senator Lazich has been in the Legislature for more than a decade. She considers herself a tireless crusader for lower taxes, reduced spending and smaller government.

The government wants to regulate your lawnmower

By Mary Lazich
Friday, Jul 18 2008, 11:00 AM

Residents of southeast Wisconsin are quite familiar with the federal agency, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

The EPA has determined the quality of air in our area is hampered by auto emissions. According to the Wisconsin Vehicle Inspection Program (WVIP) Annual Report for 2005-2006, “The U.S. EPA implemented a more stringent ozone standard, the so-called 8-hour ozone standard. In April 2004, several southeastern and eastern Wisconsin counties were designated non-attainment areas under this standard. The WVIP will play an important, ongoing role in the state’s efforts to comply with the standard.”

That means the auto emission program continues in southeast Wisconsin, although there was a change implemented in the program over two weeks ago. As of July 1, 2008, cars and trucks built before 1996 are exempt from undergoing emissions testing.

This seems odd given that the conventional wisdom is older cars produce dirtier emissions and that newer, cleaner running automobiles that have replaced older cars are cleaner and stay cleaner much longer than their predecessors. If any vehicles should be exempt, it should be the newer and not the older models.

Motorists in southeast Wisconsin are also required to pump and use reformulated gas (RFG) that during the summertime costs much more than gasoline in counties outside our region. How effective is RFG in improving the quality of our air? The Milwaukee Journal/Sentinel recently posed that question to the EPA. The EPA had to admit that it didn’t know.

From jsonline.com, June 30, 2008:

“The Public Investigator Team asked the Environmental Protection Agency exactly how the gas benefits air quality today.
The answer: ‘That's the data we don't know now,’ said Paul Machiele, director of the EPA's Fuels Center in Ann Arbor, Mich.”

During May of this year, I signed a letter with other lawmakers asking the EPA to eliminate the RFG requirement. The EPA says it's preparing a response. Remember, southeast Wisconsin consumers have complained mightily about the effect of RFG, wreaking havoc on automobiles and small engines.

That leads to the latest EPA folly. Nick Loris of the Heritage Foundation reports the EPA is considering a rule that would allow the agency to regulate the emissions of your lawnmower.

Loris writes, “This would require the agency to create different regulations and units of emissions requirements for each gadget that pollutes.”

Loris then quotes from the proposed EPA rule:

“[E]ach application could require a different unit of measure tied to the machine’s mission or output– such as grams per kilogram of cuttings from a “standard” lawn for lawnmowers and grams per kilogram-meter of load lift for forklifts.”

Needless to say, these regulations would be far-reaching, cumbersome, and costly.

Here is Loris’ piece.

The EPA is accepting public comment on the proposed rule. You can e-mail your comments to: a-and-rDocket@epa.gov, fax them to 202-566-9744, or mail them to  Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,Washington, DC 20460.

Comments

luke   

Yeah, but this is a great idea!!  How about this idea?  I have an old push mower and riding lawn mower.  I propose that the government pays to have inspectors test the emmissions on all lawn mowers, tractors, and snowblowers.  Then, if they don't pass, tell me that i need to either get it fixed and have it tested again, or buy a new one.

This way, I can be hit more than just once.  First, my taxes will go up to pay for such testers.  Second, I will need to pay for repairs because i know for sure that my machines likely will not be compliant.  After the repairs, I will likely have to get new machines anyway, costing me potentially $1000's.

Why not use that money to help clean up factories that are contributing to the problem.  Or better yet, use it as incentives for car manufacturers to produce more hybrids.  

Heck, if the EPA wants to spend money, maybe they can just buy me a new lawnmower and snow blower and save time and money of paying people to test these things.

July 18, 2008 11:51 AM

Steve Bukosky   

Thanks for the information. I emailed them my ideas. Where I work we use many forklifts which are all electric. They last all day and provided the power plant generating the electricity is clean, they are pollution free.

I have a small two stroke weed eater that uses maybe two gallons of gas mix a year. It's a dirty engine but can we admit to diminishing returns on some efforts?  Many urban yards can be mowed with an electric mower that is battery powered. Probably not cost effective yet but leave the small gas engines alone and find ways to promote the shift from petroleum powered products to electric.

Why doesn't the EPA address motorcycles? Harley Davidsons have engines as big as some small cars yet most still use polluting old time carburetors and spew unprocessed exhaust. It takes a whole bunch of lawnmowers to equal one yuppie cruising around on his hog. Years ago BMW motorcycles and Yamaha fitted fuel injection and catalytic converters on some models so it can be done. So how about some pressure for Harley Davidson to get out of the stone age and stop polluting our air with filth and noise? That'd be real environmental protection!

July 19, 2008 12:22 PM

geno53151   

I watch the nightly weather forecasts. Also, when potential tornados or thunder storms are moving into our area (New Berlin) they seem to be coming in from the WEST. If we have air quality problems, and fronts are coming in from the west, why is Madison exempt from reformulated gas since we are getting their polution?.

POLITICS ??

July 20, 2008 6:56 PM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.