WauwatosaNOW.com
search all things local
     
Blog Home |  Email Author  |  About this Blog       Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Curmudgeon's Corner

cur-mud-geon: anyone who hates hypocrisy and pretense and has the temerity to say so; anyone with the habit of pointing out unpleasant facts in an engaging and humorous manner

Police Department Budget Issues...

By Al Campbell
Friday, Oct 3 2008, 11:01 AM

This Blog promises to be too long...and I apologize up front.  BUT, this topic is critical, in my estimation, to the safety of our citizens and our property.  While we're getting everything on the table, you should know by now that "I am in the tank" for our Police Department; I make no bones about it and I am unapologetic for that!

~~~~~~~~~~

I have had several exchanges with Chief Pete Hoell about the budget of his department and about the requests that have been made of him to further reduce his budget by something north of $300,000 for 2009.  I have to tell you that he is anguished over this; he wants to remain a loyal servant of the community, he doesn't want to appear to be carping over the political situation, and he had some qualms about some of the information I'll make known in this Blog.  In the final analysis, he came down on the side of letting the citizens of the community know what is going to happen if his budget is cut any further than has been the case over the past several years. 

The budget numbers to date (as of yesterday) for the department were expected to approximate $4,501,000 for 2009 versus the $4,497,000 approved for 2008.  That is virtually a 0% increase even though fuel prices have soared and even though personnel costs are what they are.  The majority of the department budget is committed to wages and benefits since it is made up of people.

The actual discretionary operating budget, when the numbers represented above are stripped away is something on the order of $520,000.  From that, we remove the base costs such as insurance, heat, water and sewer and have some $300,000 remaining for discretionary costs.  As the chief pointed out, he has been reducing annual budget requests on a regular basis and is simply at the point where there is not much else, if anything, that can be cut.

The department is already relying on donations from the community as well as grants that are available to cover its needs.  The DARE program is funded by the school district.  Citizen's Police Academy (CPA) graduates are donating volunteer hours and are engaged in fund raising activities on behalf of the department.  The CPA program actually pays back more than its cost to the department over and above the PR value gained.  Officer Bosco's costs are funded by grants and donations.  Contributions a couple of years ago raised by CPA graduates were used to replace many of the side arms carried by officers, for example.  The motorcycle patrol is funded by contributions.  Officers are already working extra hours without overtime pay; they get compensatory time off if and when that doesn't stretch the force too much.  The department's gas costs went out of sight just as yours and mine did.

If you've toured the department's facilities, you will recall seeing a lot of "hand-me-down" equipment and furnishings.  I don't think I've seen a desk that is any newer than circa 1960.  Most of what I see has been donated by someone or other in the community.  "New" equipment, if there is to be any, is often found on the 'for sale' sites of other police departments as they replace old items with new items.  An old aquarium found its way to the evidence room for use as a finger print development tool.  The buildings are on a "bare bones" basis; this is not a department that has an excess of funding nor is it a department that wastes taxpayer dollars.  It scratches to make ends meet and continue to do its job.

Against that backdrop, permit me to get right to the point.  I don't see any other areas where costs can be reduced but the area of personnel.  That is going to impact you and me adversely. Period!  The hoped for 0% increase budget of about $4.5M would become $4.2M if the $300K is stripped out.

One of the areas that Chief Hoell had some misgivings about disclosing is the number of officers on patrol during each shift.  He discussed this with members of his command group and finally decided that, in the interest of full disclosure to the citizens, I could include this information:

We have a total of THREE officers on patrol each shift to cover the thirty-six square miles that comprise Germantown.

It is entirely possible that overlapping calls could mean that there is no one available to respond.  One heavy-duty call could easily make that happen.  The recent burglary of a Germantown construction site consumed all the patrol officers that were available.  Situations requiring all three officers and the shift commander are not that unusual.  During my ride-along, a pretty simple auto accident saw two officers and the shift commander on scene and also saw the vast majority of our fire department's on duty staff engaged along with vehicles of both departments.  This was essentially a fender-bender.  No one needed to be cut out of a vehicle; traffic control pretty much took care of itself since we were at a light-controlled intersection, etc. 

The $300,000 cut being requested of this department could, and probably would, since there isn't anything further left to chop, cause staff cutbacks that would result in two officers available for patrol duties on each shift.  That is an insufficient number considering the back-up required in many situations that are encountered.  Bar fights are difficult if not impossible to control with two officers.  Certain domestic abuse situations can easily require all three officers.  Bank robberies obviously could pull all three into that scene.  Our officers will be put in harm's way just as you and me will be adversely affected. 

I used the phrase "cutting muscle instead of fat", or something to that effect, in an earlier Blog.  I hope you now have a much better idea of what that meant.

What, you might ask, do I think we need at this point?

We need political leadership to go along with the excellent department leadership now in place.  We need people to stand up and let their political leaders know that they do not want a weak Germantown Police Department even if taxes have to go up a bit to support it at the 0% growth number.  We need to understand as a community that there comes a time when we have to pay for critical services. 

Comments

sah   

We are a family new to the area as of 2003.  I continue to be shocked that the village spent over $1 million for a suped-up senior center (and recently for "security" -- was that really an urgent need?) and yet the village doesn't have enough money to pay for police, closes its school pool, and residents are not fully behind a new school for kids (and are willing to accept that kids to be taught in hallways in some instances).  Thank goodness my kids aren't in those classes.  What a sad commentary on the priorities of Germantown leaders.  From afar it appears a few powerful, older consituents must be behind those allocations of resources.

October 3, 2008 12:08 PM

GTT   

It is sad that most of the officials in this community have their wants and needs priorities screwed up!!! If I would have done some more reserch I don't know that I would have moved to this community when i did! How that senior center was built without full community support is beyond me!

SAH I have had 2 children go through this elementary system and not once were they ever taught in a hallway! So do not believe everything you hear! Last year my youngest went through the 5th grade and only had 17 kids in his class!!!!

October 3, 2008 12:24 PM

On The Guard   

Why is it anytime I read anything on the topic of the Village budget I get nauseated? I know, it because I’m reminded of the complete imbeciles that we call our Village administration (sorry for my generalization but the majority fit into that category). The simple FACT that this is even being discussed in the fashion that it is WRONG!!! They are messing with our safety people!  WAKE UP!!!! If it’s not the Police Department it’s the Fire Department. All I ever hear is about how under staffed and underfunded both are. The Village Imbeciles know about, do nothing about it and right now want to MAKE IT WORSE!!!!! I guess my real question is, if something were to happen to one of these employees (Police or Fire) due to the gross neglect of the Village Imbeciles (i.e. the constant reminder by both departments of understaffing and not having proper equipment), wouldn’t it cost the Village more money because of all the lawsuits it will encounter?

I never feel like I translate my real frustration to words about these topics… I guess will just have to wait and see what the circus brings us next!

October 3, 2008 12:42 PM

Al Campbell   

On The Guard:

The following are not in order of importance:

I agree that we would be exposed to a significant financial penalty if that were to occur.  At the very least, the premiums for whatever protection the village might have would surely go through the roof.

Secondly, the word will spread throughout the ranks of the 'bad guys' and our nice "one of the best thirty places to live" will become the target of every crackpot within a hundred miles.

Thirdly, we will lose our excellent department person by person since they'll not want to continue in their positions knowing they have no back-up, and recognizing the community does not appear to support them.

We are engaged in false economy and need the kind of political leadership that is too seldom demonstrated.  The really great politicians are those who do what is right in spite of the political fall-out.  I'm not sure the senior center handling qualifies in this regard.

October 3, 2008 1:37 PM

On The Guard   

Al- I couldn’t agree with you more! You know as well as I do that if one of our trustees stood up and said, “NO MORE!” it probably would be the end of them. I will be curious to see how this all plays out. I’m almost sure it will continue and all the Village Imbeciles will be running around with their tails between their legs looking for some facade to hide behind. The that façade will probably be the notion that people don’t want higher taxes. Like I’ve said before, I’ll take higher taxes any day, instead of living in fear that there won’t be a Police officer when I need one or an ambulance or fire truck for that matter.

October 3, 2008 2:19 PM

Chief Peter Hoell   

First I would like to say that on behalf of the members of the Police Department, we really appreciate the public support.   It does mean a lot to us.  

I would respectfully make one requests.  I know things at times can be frustrating; however I would really like to see a constructive exchange and ask that we refrain from the name calling.  

There are Trustees who have spoken to me directly and they do not support this type of cut.  

Thank you again and please feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions.

phoell@germantownpolice.org

Chief Pete Hoell

October 4, 2008 1:43 PM

CROD   

What is it going to take for our village Trustees to relize that Public Safety should be their first priority. If we want our fine village to continue being a fine village, our trustees need to switch there priorities. First the Trustees won't even give the residents the choice in a referendum if they are willing to pay for 24 Hour coverage for the fire department, keep in mind many of our residents think we already have that, and now they want to cash strap the police department. It does not make any sense. If anything we should be looking at adding to both the Germantown Police Department and the Germantown Fire Department. 36 square miles is a lot of area to cover for 3,4 or even 5 police officers. Look at the number of calls for service for the police department, and then tell me how this budget is not going to adversly affect the officers safety, response time and performance of the police department. Any failure in funding by this village WILL have an impact on all three. Since the village likes studies, may be it is time for the village to pay for another study to evaluate the police department's staffing level. Oh ya, I forgot, they won't follow the recommendations anyhow, so lets save that money and add it to the police department budget. Chief Hoell, you and your officers are doing an excellent job with the resources you have, but how can the Trustees tell you one thing and do another? The first thing that comes to mind for me is that Public Safety is NOT the number one priority for these Trustees and that puts me and my family at risk as well as every other resident of Germantown.

October 4, 2008 10:12 PM

On The Guard   

Chief Hoell-

Only out of respect for you I will refrain from the phrase “Village Imbeciles”. I would like clarify something first:

The term imbeciles was not meant as “name calling” but as a classification of their mental capacity (or lack thereof). It doesn’t surprise  me that there are trustee’s that do not support “this type of cut”. For once they don’t have what they consider the upper hand. They aren’t in control of this blog and there is someone publicly criticizing their horrible decision making. I ask that you pass it on to the trustees that have a problem with how they classified their decisions, that maybe they should really evaluate what they say, in a public meeting, about MY safety and the safety of ALL the residence of Germantown. As a little child I was taught by my parents to THINK before you speak. It was something I learned between the ages of three and seven (give or take), hence why I used the term imbecile. I’m sorry if I offended you, but it was just no shot from the hip. What about how offended I am? Keep up the good work Chief…

CROD-

Excellent!

October 5, 2008 9:34 AM

JAFO IN GTOWN   

I see that this years budget is viewable on line at www.village.germantown.wi.us/Budget2008.htm   What a shame that the villages proposed budget for next year is not posted for public viewing (unlike the school district, who put it out there for all to view at www.germantown.k12.wi.us/.../SemiDetailBudgetDraft%234ReworkedMotion%234.pdf

It's interesting to note the changes in Village budgets since 2006:  nearly 100% more in Senior Center operations (not the cost of the building!); 50% more in "municipal development", grounds maintenance and the assessors office; 80% in "general government", "data processing" and the recycling center; and an increase of a quarter of a million dollars in the recreation department.

Over the past five years, according to the Village of Germantown's website, the village tax levy rate has increased by 50 cents from $5.31 to something north of $5.80 this coming year.  At the same time, county tax has dropped only slightly from $3.80, and the much-maligned MATC tax has risen by less than 30 cents.  Oddly enough, the school tax has dropped by more than a dollar.

Perhaps those school district tax cuts are at fault, here.  The village leaders got drawn into the allure of "tax incremental financing" for tens of millions of dollars of taxpayer debt which might be repaid through diverting school taxes from those industries every year.  At the time, the school tax rate was nearly triple what it is, now (I went to the library and looked it up:  in 1992, the school levy rate was over $30).

Here's a challenge for village officials:  publish the financial state of your TIF districts on your website, let the people know the facts.  Quit hiding.

Just about a year ago, an article in the Milwaukee Journal quoted village officials as saying they'd have to hit up the taxpayers for a million dollars more in 2009, and beyond, to make the payments for a business park that's only 33% developed after 15 years.  Perhaps this is why the police and fire departments are being forced to scale back their services as the village leaders seek to chop a reported $900,000 from the total budget.  Instead, though, why not return those other departments such as recreation, senior center and recyling center, to their previous levels of funding as a start?

I'll do what the police chief told me in his post above.  I'll refrain from attaching labels to individuals out of respect for him and fear of being tazed (yes, Al Campbell, I did read your other column.)  But as an observer, it seems to me that the village people might want to find out what the county board does to hold the line on their share of the property tax, and most especially the school board who keeps dropping their share.  I don't know that either of those two groups have had to cut services to the degree that's being forecast here.

October 5, 2008 9:46 AM

Chief Peter Hoell   

On The Guard,

No offense taken.  I do understand the points you make.  Thank you and JAFO In GTown for your responsiveness to my request.

October 5, 2008 11:08 AM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.